- enables more accurate and rapid dioxin determination than using the JIS method -
The Institute for Environmental Management Technology [Director: Takashi Ibusuki] and Human Stress Signal Research Center [Director: Etsuo Niki] of the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science & Technology (AIST) [President: Hiroyuki Yoshikawa]succeeded in rapid and accurate determination of dioxin concentration in actual environmental samples (fly ash from waste incinerators extracted and cleaned up with a accelerated solvent extractor) using QCM sensors. This development enables highly accurate and rapid dioxin determination in proportion to the GC/MS method in the JIS standard. It is hoped that it will make on-site determination of dioxins possible.
Acknowledgements: this development benefited from assistants of Hitachi Kyowa Engineering Co., Ltd. [President: Katsutoshi Kataoka] for GC/MS analysis of dioxins in environmental samples, Daiichi Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. [President: Yuichiro Takeda] for ELISA detection of environmental samples, and Nihon Dempa Kogyo Co., Ltd. [President: Toshiaki Takeuchi] for preparation of QCMs for dioxin sensors.
So far, dioxin concentration and toxic equivalent quantity in the environment could only be measured by the GC/MS method (JIS method).
Analysis results of dioxin concentration in environmental samples by the QCM method showed good correlation with the standard GC/MS method and ELISA, which are conventional dioxin determination techniques. The amount of waste to be incinerated was smaller because of the minute quantity of samples (not more than 10μL). Furthermore, analysis was completed in six hours (in contrast to about one week by the standard JIS method) from sample collection.
A simple measuring device for dioxins in environmental samples with the QCM sensor (dioxin sensor) is developed.
The dioxin sensor comprises a main unit of a low-cost battery-powered sensor (see the attached photo) and a single-round sensor chip for dioxins. It is expected that it will make on-site determination possible in compliance with the Law Concerning Special Measures against Dioxins which will be strictly administered from this December.
The result will be presented in QCM2002, which will be held on July 24-25, 2002, in Brighton, England.
Future, research is planned for: optimal determination equipment for high- and low-concentration dioxin analysis; applying that determination method to “High-Concentration Dioxin Analysis in Fly Ash from Waste Incinerators and in Soil around Such Facilities” and to “Low-Concentration Dioxin Analysis in Water, Air, Underwater Sediments, and Tissue-Derived Samples”; and comparison of data acquired by GC/MS, ELISA, and quartz crystal methods. Moreover, there is a plan to develop sensors for disease marker proteins which appear in blood along with diseases. This is accomplished to meet the needs of an ever-aging society by altering the antibody to be immobilised on the QCM sensor-chip for the purpose of home health care.
—:See attached Glossary
|
Figure: Appearance of the Dioxin Sensor Developed by AIST |
The conventional analysis method for dioxins in compliance with the JIS method requires copious quantities of work, time and cost because environmental samples need to be extracted from target objects and cleaned before measurement by the GC/MS method. Also, in order to calculate dioxin concentration and its toxic equivalent quantity, it is necessary to determine concentration of each dioxin isomer and multiply it by its toxicity coefficient to convert it into a value in 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD). As dioxins are very toxic, the analysis procedure requires experienced analysts with high skill to perform analyses in a laboratory under safety controls. In Japan, there are few organizations that analyse samples on a contract basis. It costs approximately ¥250,000 per sample for an analysis which takes about three months. Therefore, it has been difficult to obtain sample analysis for common citizens, consumer cooperatives, agricultural cooperatives, industrial waste disposal contractors, and those construction sites and waterworks-related companies which require soil analysis.
On the other hand, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is widely used as a simple determination method of dioxins. This method utilises highly specific immunoreaction that binds with an antigen; the antigen is recognised as foreign when foreign substances such as chemicals enter the body of an organism. Immunoreaction is also used in blood analysis for medical diagnosis and in BSE investigation, but it is supposed that pretreatment (removal or extraction of other components) presents difficulties with some samples.
Anti-2,3,7,8-TCDD monoclonal antibody, which is the only one available in the market, shows high reactivity with 2,3,7,8-TCDD, the most toxic dioxin, but its reactivity with other dioxin isomers and homologues is low. For that reason, it was difficult to evaluate the toxic equivalent quantity; simple, sensitive determination of dioxins seemed difficult. This study made positive use of cross-reactivity of the anti-dioxin antibody and proved it could be utilised not only for determination of dioxin concentration in environmental samples, but also for estimation of the toxic equivalent quantity.
AIST (formerly, the National Institute of Materials and Chemical Research) investigated the feasibility of ultrasensitive sensors for dioxin measurements and demonstrated their usefulness under the project “Preliminary Investigation on Utilization of Sensors in Environmental Determination of Dioxins” in preliminary investigation of the Environment Agency in the second half of FY1999. Moreover, AIST developed a method for highly sensitive and simple determination of dioxins using QCM sensors in the course of performing the succeeding project “Study on Measures against Environmental Risk Using the Sensing System of Dioxins and Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals” under a grant for scientific research on global environment protection from the Ministry of the Environment (FY2001-2005). It examined optimal conditions through demonstration experiments for sensor usage using samples that contained high- and low-concentration dioxins which were extracted from actual environmental samples and pretreated.
Conditions for measurement of 2,3,7,8-TCDD were examined using a QCM on which anti-2,3,7,8-TCDD monoclonal antibody and its stabiliser were immobilised; it was shown that measurement of 2,3,7,8-TCDD concentration was possible in a concentration range from 0.1ng/mL to 100ng/mL. Such concentration was sufficient for the sensitivity required for environmental monitoring at around 80ng-TEQ, which was the environmental standard for soil. Using this method, determination conditions for the QCM were examined with samples that contained high-concentration dioxins prepared from actual environmental samples (fly ash from waste incinerators) through pretreatment and cleanup by an accelerated solvent extractor. The analysis result of dioxin concentration in environmental samples by the QCM method showed good correlation with dioxin concentration determined by the conventional GC/MS method and with the current simple determination method ELISA. The amount of waste to be incinerated was smaller because of the minute amount of samples (not more than 10μL). Furthermore, analysis was completed in six hours (in contrast to about one week by the conventional JIS method) from sample collection.
The current method with anti-dioxin antibody utilises antigenic specificity of antibody in immunoreaction, but the antibody has cross-reactivity to compounds that have similar chemical structure with the antigen. Therefore, the differential composition of dioxins in the target object may cause errors in results such as excessive or insufficient response. In order to establish a reliable estimation range for determination of dioxin concentration and toxic equivalent quantity in environmental samples by the QCM method, comparative study with analysis data of actual environmental samples by the GC/MS method will be continued along with refinement of the equipment. Measurement of dioxin concentrations in sedimentary soil, air, water, fish meat, breast milk, and blood require higher sensitivity to enable measurement in the picogram range, 10-100 times more sensitive than the current detection range in the nanogram (10-9g) range. Development is anticipated for equipment for dioxin determination that has a femtogram (10-15g) to picogram (10-12g) measuring range of dioxins so that it can measure such samples. Develop is also anticipated for a technology for miniaturization of equipment for further reduction of measuring time and sample amounts. At the same time, there is a project to prepare anti-dioxin antibody other than the available ones for tetrachlorinated dioxin. They would enable recognition of penta- or hexachlorinated dioxins which are commonly found in fly ash from waste incinerators and have high toxicity coefficients. Other efforts to evaluate performance of sensor devices with the antibody will be boosted for further development to improve immunoreaction selectivity.